He was one of the first to foresee the consequences of not taking a firm stand against the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931. Into a House of Commons debate mainly devoted to currency, commerce, industry and tariffs, typically he intruded Manchuria and put forward the League position:
|
It is a test question. We have to decide whether war is to be permitted... We have the whole of the League plus America on the one side and Japan on the other. [I hope the Council for the League would] use all the moral force they possibly can... and if that were not enough use financial and economic pressure and, if that will not do, use pressure in the way of a blockade in preventing goods from going into or coming out of Japan... We have to take a bold and courageous view and, without using any physical force-that will not be necessary-mobilise all the different methods of economic, financial and moral pressure which are available to force Japan to realise that war is not going to be permitted to break out again... There is no doubt that, if we fail in this issue, we are abandoning all the hope that arose out of the war, and the sacrifice of a million Englishmen, to say nothing of nine million others, who gave their lives for a great ideal will very largely have been in vain.' 8 |
As war again threatened again in the Thirties, he was one of the first to speak out against the Dictators. He tabled the International Economic Sanctions (Enabling) Bill of 17 May 1933, which made him 'one of the first to call attention to the German danger publicly in Parliament and at the same time make definite proposals for dealing with it'; supporters included Sir Austen Chamberlain whose 'death in 1937 was a heavy blow to peace'. The Peace Bill of 23 May 1935 (and subsequently) incorporated machinery embodied in the Covenant of the League of Nations for the settlement of international disputes, and was supported by Harold Macmillan, P. Noel-Baker, Sir Richard Acland and Lovat Fraser, inter alia.
In the 1935 General Election his comfortable victory against the Labour and Conservative opposition bucked the trend when the Liberals won only two other urban seats where they faced competition from both the other parties. He became a vehement, articulate critic of Neville Chamberlain's policy of Appeasement, and his 'inability to see what was going on in the
world', an ally of Churchill, Eden and Sinclair, whose polemical jabs were a wake-up call against a deep-rooted national will to self-deception. He said that it would remain
'one of the regrets of my life that I did not make some sort of speech ... when Mr. Chamberlain announced his intention of flying to Munich... If the Debate had been kept up, the spell would have been broken... Others would have followed and the dangers inherent in what was happening would have been exposed.'
His polemic was set forth in his book, We were not all Wrong (1941), arguing that many people and parties foresaw the disaster to which errors of policy in dealing with 'the Nazi menace' in the 1930s would inevitably lead:
|
Municheers should never again be allowed to control our destinies. It is too ghastly to think of the same unimaginative, isolationist, naïve, complacent attitude, however well meant, being adopted after the war. Absolute national sovereignty has outlived its usefulness in the world in which we now live, just as has the Divine Right of Kings internally. Old loyalties, deep-rooted, historic and admirable, remain... It is our responsibility as it is in our power in the great adventure we must lead: England cannot afford to be little, she must be what she is-or nothing.10 |
A generation later, his son, John Mander, a political journalist and cultural critic, described the origins of Appeasement. Ironically, he wrote, in its intellectual perspective it was largely the creation of liberals of nonconformist background like his father:
|
Evidently ... the roots of Appeasement lie deep: they lie in the English penchant for wishful thinking, they lie in the English easy-goingness and tolerance, they lie in that insularity which for the greatest part of our history has been our greatest boon, but which, over the past century has proved, arguably, our greatest curse.11 |
When Geoffrey spoke up in the House of Commons in support of sanctions against Italy after the invasion of Abyssinia, Mussolini fired off a personal diatribe against him in his paper, the
Popolo d'Italia. In 1938, in a climate of international tension,
il duce took reprisals against the Milan branch of 'Fratelli Mander' and asked customers to boycott their goods.

A fine summer evening's view of Wightwick
Manor from the rear garden. |
He was far sighted in many of his peace campaigns. He was one of a handful of MPs who inveighed against Hitler's territorial ambitions in the Ukraine in 1935. As war broke out in 1939, he pleaded the Jewish cause, telling Parliament in July that Government immigration policy was leaving Jews with no escape from Germany 'other than by illegal immigration into Palestine'. In April 1941, he wrote in the Jewish Standard: 'The cause of the Jews throughout the world is the cause for which Great Britain and her allies are fighting'.
| Princess
Sudhira Mander, who married Alan, Geoffrey's
brother. |
|
|
During the war, when the Liberals were asked to join the government coalition under Churchill, Geoffrey became Parliamentary Private Secretary (1942-5) to their leader, Sir Archibald Sinclair (later Lord
Thurso), the Minister for Air.12 Mander Brothers' Heath Town works was marked with a red ring on a Luftwaffe plan, found after the war, as
'Chemikalien', indicated as a strategic target for bombing. He rescued various bomb-damaged fragments of the House of Commons from the Blitz, installing two stone crowns from the pinnacles of Big Ben as ornaments about the garden at
Wightwick. He kept the archives of the League of Nations Union when they were forced by financial difficulties to move to smaller premises in the early 1940s.
Wolverhampton East was one of the last urban constituencies that the Liberals managed to hold against both Labour and Conservative opposition up to 1945. But
he lost his seat in the Labour landslide of the 1945 General Election and was knighted in the same year
(K.B.); "his was a great loss to Parliament". |
Thurso regretted the 'massacre' of so many 'able, experienced and popular' candidates as he.13 There was a rumour for a time of his being given a peerage, and the Press proposed he be gazetted with the equivocal title 'Lord Meander', in commemoration of his tireless crusades and pertinacious questions, seamless diatribes and string of private member's bills in the House.
|
In 1948 he joined the Labour Party, arguing that it had become the logical successor of the Liberal tradition in his pamphlet
To Liberals, written for the Labour Party in 1950. In due course he became a Labour member of the County Council. To many members of a family whose traditions stretched to radical Whiggery, this was beyond the pale. But he did say privately, that if he had not lost his seat, he would have remained a Liberal, and most likely have been appointed chief whip of the Liberals in Parliament.
Geoffrey Mander the politician was not quite forgotten by an older generation. The first question Rab Butler asked me when I followed Cousin Geoffrey to Trinity, Cambridge was, 'How are you related to that b***er, Geoffrey?'14 My own memories are of a fusty, Edwardian patriarch, small in stature, with a watch chain, who called in after church with his political friends like Clem Attlee. Apart from his public service in politics, his liberalism is vividly exemplified in his career as an industrialist and an art patron. |

Geoffrey Mander admiring the
Morris 'bird' pattern curtains with the Attlees. |
|
The family company, Mander Brothers, was known between the wars as a model company. Geoffrey, as the eldest of his generation, was chairman, while his cousin, Charles Arthur (the second baronet), was managing director. Sir Charles was 'wet' as a Tory, active in local government and Midland affairs, and deeply interested in everything that touched the human side of industry. In Parliament Geoffrey had pushed through the Joint Industrial Councils and Work Councils Bills. Together they
implemented typically progressive initiatives in industrial welfare, to foster peace in industry.
These included a joint works' council providing a workable system of joint consultation (1920), a welfare club (1920), profit-sharing schemes for employees, holiday schemes, suggestion schemes (1925), works pensions (1928), a house magazine, staff pensions (1935), and a 'contributory co-partnership scheme' setting aside shares for employees, with provisions to pay for shares by instalments.
Most notably, Manders was the first company in the country to introduce the forty-hour week. The historic agreement, the first of its kind in Britain, was brokered and signed by Ernest Bevin, general secretary of the Transport and General Workers' Union, in September 1932. 'Bevin was very proud of signing that agreement', said Geoffrey later: 'He used often to refer to it when were both in the House of Commons.' The press wrote: 'In the history of industrial welfare, Manders may claim a high place', where welfare had been 'part and parcel of the outlook of Manders as employers almost since the company's foundation in [1773]'. Geoffrey was reported summarizing:
|
My ancestors were very religious people. They always used to open the day's work with prayers and lead hymn-singing at the end of the day. Those religious principles which coloured their dealings with the then small number of workpeople were the forerunners of welfare principles as we know them today. In the history of industrial welfare Manders may lay claim to a great deal of pioneering work. |
|